What are the implications of Sallee destroying brokerage disclosure records that are two and a half years old?

Focusing on the implications of Sallee destroying brokerage disclosure records that are over two years old, the correct answer relates to the responsibility of the broker. In Virginia, brokerage disclosure records typically must be maintained for a minimum of five years. If Sallee destroyed these records prematurely, it raises concerns about Skyler’s adherence to proper recordkeeping protocols as a broker.

As a broker, Skyler has the obligation to ensure that all records are kept in accordance with state law. Therefore, if records are destroyed in violation of this requirement, it indicates a lapse in Skyler’s duty to maintain adequate documentation for all transactions. This can be considered negligent behavior on Skyler's part, potentially leaving him open to disciplinary actions from the licensing authority or legal challenges from clients or other entities.

The other choices do not accurately reflect the real estate regulations in Virginia. Automatic penalties are not typically issued without a review process, and stating that Sallee is not responsible for recordkeeping overlooks the broker's overarching duties. Furthermore, the notion that records only need to be kept for one year is incorrect since the regulation clearly specifies a longer duration. Thus, the focus on negligence in recordkeeping is the most accurate implication of the actions taken regarding the destruction of those records.